![]() ![]() Do the RIGHT thing but do it as if it's your company and hustle to better your department/company and to rake in more cash, the hard working way, so there can be more toys (for some, to make payroll and keep the lights on maybe). Don't get punked around! nor punk others because you feel like the judge.ĭon't do anything dishonest or something that makes you feel uncomfortable. What I'm saying is don't spend too much time politrickin' with the engineer get your supervisor to do that for you while you figure out what IS best inspection method and if the part really is GOOD or BAD. My point is simple, don't make it an act of congress trying to pass a bill, they sit on their behind and waste MANY taxpayers money. I've seen very dishonest inspectors that if and when they have personal problems with others who are presenting a part will REJECT GOOD PARTS just to make the person feel bad. I've spent a lot of time chasing the money around SoCal and as a result have been to over 10 different companies in just a few years. DO NOT RUBBER STAMP ANYTHING WITHOUT FIRST FEELING CONFIDENT ABOUT THE PART! (by bumping it up against every call out/ spec on the print/contract/etc.) You might of taken it over way too far to the other side of the spectrum but I didn't do a good job of explaining myself either. ![]() That is why I'm a firm believer in not putting quality in the manufacturing department on the company tree as it does not give quality the anonymity it needs to function as necessary for the company.No worries, no tears over here. Quality is there as a check in the system not a rubber stamping theater operation to make it appear the company cares about themselves or their customer. While every other department in the company is asking to get this out on time or get this done at a lower cost the quality department is there to ask is this right per whatever rules we are using? If you allow group think of getting the parts out as fast as possible or making it as cheap as possible, then you will get burned as a company. I consider quality to be the check in the system such as the Supreme Court is supposed to be the check system in the US government. I will have to kindly disagree with this philosophy. IF you're in a cost center SAVE as much money for the company, move the part to scrap or move it forward in production. IF you're in revenue center, the goal is to shovel as much money into company. 2 departments in companies Revenue and Cost centers. Shady people can only get away with crap for so long. If my programs don't match the granite (within reason) I go back to the CMM to debug.įocus! You're in a money making business, if that engineer is harassing you get your higher up and leave it up to him to decide what should be expected of you AND email, email, email can't say that enough. CMM is fast and accurate (depending on the programmer) you can also be accurate (but not so fast). A good competent Inspector could confidently call it good or bad CMM or not IMNSHO. The CMM is designed to do what our fathers did on the stone (well most of it). If it matches the CMM output.put your stamp on it. ![]() ![]() Place the friggin' part on the CMM, plane the granite (avoid craters), output the flatness, print results, compare on a calibrated granite and inspect the old skool way. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |